Women Seen and Heard

Forbes’ latest list of the world’s 100 most powerful women is out, with German Chancellor Angela Merkel on top, FDIC Forbes women hero Sheila Bair at #2, and “performance with purpose” Pepsi CEO Indra Nooyi at #3.

Women to watch include Ursula Burns of Xerox, Chanda Kochhar of ICICI Bank, Johanna Sigurdardottir of Iceland, and Sallie Krawchek of Bank of America — for all of whom the magazine predicts “the next 12 months could be exciting–and terrifying.”

Also on this list is Queen Rania of Jordan (No. 75), whom Forbes describes as “perhaps the most listened-to woman in the Middle East; her Twitter feed has 600,000 followers.”  You heard it here first!

WSJ on Obama’s Contradictions

The editorialists at the Wall Street Journal have been listening closely to President Obama’s town halls on health care and what they’ve heard implicates the president as his own fiercest opponent. A sample:

Maybe you’re starting to fret about all those bureaucrats and bean-counters again. You shouldn’t, according to Mr. Obama. “The only thing I would point is, is that Medicare is a government program that works really well for our seniors,” he noted in Colorado. After all, as he said in New Hampshire, “If we’re able to get something right like Medicare, then there should be a little more confidence that maybe the government can have a role—not the dominant role, but a role—in making sure the people are treated fairly when it comes to insurance.”

The government didn’t get Medicare right, though: Just ask the President. The entitlement is “going broke” (Colorado) and “unsustainable” and “running out of money” (New Hampshire). And it’s “in deep trouble if we don’t do something, because as you said, money doesn’t grow on trees” (Montana).

Unintended Consequences of Health Reform

More from someecards.com on health reform:

I'm concerned the debate over death panels has given my HMO the idea of having death panels

If You Can’t Beat ‘Em, Subpoena ‘Em

In a display of Congressional power that would have pleased Joe McCarthy, Democrats Henry Waxman and Bart Stupak – representing the House Energy and Commerce Committee and its Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight – have demanded internal documents about salaries and expenses from insurance companies.

As Politico reports:

By Sept. 4, the firms are supposed to supply detailed compensation data for board members and top executives, as well as a “table listing all conferences, retreats, or other events held outside company facilities from January 1, 2007, to the present that were paid for, reimbursed, or subsidized in whole or in part by your company.”

For employees or officers making $500,000 or more, the committee wants information on salary, bonus, options and pension. And by Sept. 14, the firms are supposed to provide copies of reports from compensation consultants, plus board drafts of compensation plans, and information about market share.

This is proprietary information about the way private companies do business. The government has no right to it. This is simply another tactic in Democrats’ war on insurers.

The clear purpose is to paint insurance companies as profligate profit-makers more interested in rewarding executives than serving the insured. Notice the chairmen didn’t ask for information about the billions of dollars spent on patient care. This is bald political payback.

I can only imagine the outcry if Republicans had used their legislative authority to seek information about private sector entities friendly with Democrats. (Of course, few private sector entities are friendly with Democrats.)

An interesting side note is that the letter from Waxman and Stupak went to executives at 52 private insurance companies – 52! What was Kathleen Sebelius saying about choice and competition?

In any event, this is a gross (in every sense of the word) abuse of power by the Dems. I hope a few insurers have the guts to tell them “no” and fight this out in court if necessary.

Dems Get Ready to Pull the Trigger (Not on Grandma)

With Republicans resisting the push for socialist-ish medicine, Democrats are ready to go it alone – and of course blame Republicans for standing in the way of progress.

Here’s Rahm, via ABC:

“The Republican leadership,” said the White House chief of staff, “has made a strategic decision that defeating President Obama’s health care proposal is more important for their political goals than solving the health insurance problems that Americans face every day.”

Statements like this – sounding like they emerged from some hyper-political messaging robot, as opposed to an actual human being – are what turn off the vast majority of normal people to politics.

But of course the whole idea of “bipartisan” legislation was a sham from the start. The White House wanted Republicans to vote for a Democratic bill; they didn’t actually want to consider any Republican ideas about making health care more consumer-driven and price-sensitive, or strengthening the individual market.

I think Republicans would be happy to have the Democrats overreach and pass a government-focused bill with 53 votes in the Senate to go along with the House. A “White House advisor” told CNN, “If we have to push it through this way, no one is going to remember how messy it was. At the end of the day, they’ll remember we got health care reform done. A win is a win.”

I don’t know about that. The media may not remind people how messy – or ill-considered – it was, but Republicans will be happy to deliver that message.

As RNC Chair Michael Steele said, “You’ve got the votes – pull the trigger!”

Why Obama Lost Health Reform

sad obamaIn early May, President Obama announced that a series of health industry organizations had agreed to trim $2 trillion in costs from their operations. The move signaled that the big players in health care were aligning with, not against, systemic reform. It may have been the high water mark of the president’s push for government control of health care.

Last week, President Obama was left insisting in multiple venues that his health reform plan would not result in “pulling the plug on grandma.” Over the weekend, several members of his Administration, including Health Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, said a government-run health care option – once the crown jewel of the Obama health plan – isn’t essential.

The key, Sebelius and others said, is that we have “competition” in the system. Well, guess what? Mission accomplished. There are already hundreds of for-profit and non-profit health insurance companies competing against each other in the US market, making exceptional health care available to the vast majority of Americans.

How did President Obama’s vision of government-oriented health care delivery go so far off track? How did this noted communicator end up decidedly on the defensive? I see two reasons. Read More »

CNN’s Fishy Take on Obama

sick fishNot since Teddy Roosevelt carted carcasses into the White House have the press found so much meaning in presidential pastimes.

Earlier this week Time magazine told us how President Obama’s golf game offers insight into his leadership style. Friday, CNN.com previewed the president’s trip to Montana with a story headlined: “Obama’s fly-fishing trip is apt metaphor for health care pitch.”

The piece by White House producer Shawna Shepherd includes groaners such as, “Obama is in the ‘big fish’ stage of his presidency: He’s trying to get health-care reform legislation passed hook, line, and sinker” and “Obama just needs to look at hooking and landing Blue Dog Democrats and Republicans like he would trout.”

Shepherd concludes, “Out in Montana, the game is catch-and-release trout. But in Washington, Obama is trying to hook Congress and take home health care reform, or risk it being the big one that got away.”

Apparently everything this president does – even in his spare time – is fraught with meaning. Next up: Rising economy mirrors Obama’s bowling average.

White House Unleashes Virus on American Public

Sorry, that should read “White House unleashes viral email,” according to Jake Tapper at ABC News.

The email, from Obama political adviser David Axelrove — er, Axelrod — is meant to combat those other viral emails, which contain false information about health reform and manage to spread like wildfire.

It’s a smart strategy by the White House, which is attempting to fight the information battle where it’s happening — in the FW: FW: FW: lines of email inboxes across America.

So what falsehoods has Axelrod uncovered? According to Tapper:

The eight “common myths” are: that reform will lead to rationing and will mean a “government takeover” of health care; that reform is unaffordable; that it will encourage “euthanasia”; that it will limit veterans’ access to health care; that it will hurt small businesses; that it will be paid for by cutting Medicare benefits; that health reform will force Americans out of their current insurance plans or force them to change doctors; that it will mean the government will be in charge of Americans’ bank accounts.

Of course, most of those aren’t actually myths, they’re just inconvenient facts and/or probabilities.

But that’s OK. Viral emails typically contain a lot of bad info. This one won’t be any different.

Govt Health Care = Shiny, Happy People

Mike Allen in today’s Politico: “A new coalition this morning is launching $12 million in TV ads to support President Obama’s health-reform plan, in the opening wave of a planned tens of millions of dollars this fall. The new group, funded largely by PhRMA, is called Americans for Stable Quality Care. It includes some odd bedfellows: the American Medical Association, FamiliesUSA, the Federation of American Hospitals, PhRMA and SEIU.”

Allen transcribed the first ad:

“What DOES health insurance reform mean for you? It means you can’t be denied coverage for a pre-existing condition, or dropped if you get sick. It means putting health-care decisions in the hands of you and your doctor. It means lower costs, a cap on out-of-pocket expenses, tough new rules to cut waste and red tape, and a focus on PREVENTING illness before it strikes. So what does health insurance reform really mean? Quality, affordable care you can count on.”

Well that’s certainly one incredibly Pollyannaish way of looking at it. Higher taxes, an end to private-sector health care, and government diktats about treatment don’t enter into this conversation.

It’s sort of like an ad for eating that would say, “What DOES eating mean for you? It means ice cream and cookies. All the chocolate you could dream of. Beer of many varieties. A daily nacho plate – that you’ll never have to share. So what is eating? A life of uninterrupted indulgence, with no negative repercussions whatsoever.” Calories, obesity, and heart disease – who now?

With the soothing words, gauzy cinematography, and pictures of smiling, relieved patients in various health care settings, the ad will no doubt be effective in quelling some of the angst about what a government takeover of health care really will mean.

But if the public bites on this, there’s going to be a pretty awful stomach ache down the line.

Barack Obama is a Bourgeois Pig, Or Some Such

obama-golfWell, well, well. Just days after Time gave us the 411 on President Obama’s golf game — and let us know it’s a solid indicator of the overall quality of his presidency — we find out that, uh-oh, golf ain’t so cool anymore.

At least among the global socialist elite.

The New York Times reports that Venezuelan top-dog and Joe Kennedy idol Hugo Chavez is shuttering golf courses in his revolutionary wonderland. Sayeth the Times:

After a brief tirade against the sport by the president on national television last month, pro-Chávez officials have moved in recent weeks to shut down two of the country’s best-known golf courses.

The tirade?

“Let’s leave this clear,” Mr. Chávez said during a live broadcast of his Sunday television program. “Golf is a bourgeois sport,” he said, repeating the word “bourgeois” as if he were swallowing castor oil. Then he went on, mocking the use of golf carts as a practice illustrating the sport’s laziness.

So there you have it, from someone who would know: Barack Obama is a capitalist dog.

But I don’t like foreign wing-nuts speaking ill of our president – or of a refined Scottish game. So to show my patriotic colors, I’m going to tee it up tomorrow morning.

Woof.

Health Scare

Since it’s the middle of August and we’re just phoning it in, here’s an interesting take on the current health-care debate (and protests) from someecards.com:

Socialized medicine scares me a lot less than the people scared of socialized medicine

Worst Cocktail Party Ever?

090810_pundits_vidoverlayPolitico has some videos it describes as “Pundits on town hall tempers.” After seeing this Brady Bunch-style image teasing the clips, I took some Pepto Bismal and clicked over here.

Whole in One

Yahoo! teased a Time magazine article on President Obama’s golf game with the headline, “What Obama’s golf game reveals about the way he governs.”

Because I’m so ga-ga over the president, I just had to know.

The answer? He’s everything we could ever hope for. Natch.

According to Time’s Michael Scherer, “Presidents, like normal people, tend to seek in others what they admire about themselves. Which brings us to the par-5 12th hole at Woodlawn golf course.”

(Yeah, he actually wrote “like normal people” – apparently angling for a job at Us Weekly.)

You won’t be surprised to learn that, on the 12th, Vice President Biden landed a tricky little shot spitting-distance from the cup, prompting the president to laud him as “calm under pressure. That’s why he’s my vice president.”

Pssst … that’s what Scherer is saying about the president, too. He’s calm under pressure. Read More »

Death Panels and Democratic Purity

grim reaper copTwo quick health care nuggets today.

First, Sarah Palin writing about the Obama plan on her Facebook account (that’s what happens when you leave the governor’s mansion):

[W]ho will suffer the most when they ration care? The sick, the elderly, and the disabled, of course. The America I know and love is not one in which my parents or my baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama’s “death panel” so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their “level of productivity in society,” whether they are worthy of health care. Such a system is downright evil.

I’m going to check with my sources, but I don’t think the term “death panel” appears in any of the bills under consideration in Congress. (Though there may be a Death Czar.)

Governor Palin’s point, though overwrought, is well-taken. But at a time when people are getting pretty fired up about health care, responsible public figures shouldn’t be making overwrought public statements. Let the facts do the talking.

Second, the AP has anointed Democrats the party of purity. In an article about the pharmaceutical lobby helping the White House and Congress make their push for government-run health care, AP’s David Espo writes: Read More »

Hints on Humor

Hints on humor, from my West Wing colleague Julia Lam:

The Washington Post is shuttering “Mouthpiece Theater,” Howard Kurtz recently announced. In this past week, the satirical video series featuring Dana Milbank and Chris Cillizza drew criticism over an indecorous Hillary Clinton joke.  In retrospect, Cillizza said, “name-calling is never the stuff of good comedy.”

What does make for good comedy?

“Be funny quickly,” advises humor columnist Dave Barry.  Avoid the kind of circuitous stories that take forever to get to the punch line – and then take forever to move on.  It’s all in the pacing: “You don’t let the reader [or listener] see it coming, you hit the reader with it, and then you get out of there.”

Use comedy (when appropriate) as leavening.  Journalist Jim Collins says, “Humor… cuts the sweet. It lightens what otherwise might be overwrought and also lightens what might be too dark.”

Respect the audience.  You don’t have to pander, but it’s nice to recognize who you’re addressing.  “If possible,” speechwriter Charles Sweeney suggests, “[use jokes] that are specific to the location.”

For more, see NPR’s “Politics and Humor: Fun on the Stump,” featuring West Wing Writers’ Jeff Nussbaum.