CEO in Chief at the Business Roundtable

President Obama had a good appearance yesterday before the Business Roundtable, a collection of CEOs from top companies. In his remarks, and particularly in the Q and A, the president sounded like the pragmatic, facts-first leader that drew many non-traditional Democratic supporters to him.

His remarks on cap-and-trade were especially encouraging. While his insistence that a new regime wouldn’t begin to be implemented until 2012 is something of a fig leaf (businesses would have to begin planning for such a giant government revenue increase immediately), he sounded genuinely interested in discussing options for how the plan is implemented. (See the discussion with Weyerhaeuser’s Dan Fulton near the end.) Read More »

Women’s Issues

West Wing Writers had the pleasure of meeting with a visiting delegation of Swedish and Danish progressives earlier this week, and talking about political communications in anticipation of upcoming electoral campaigns in Scandinavia.  Among the topics we debated was whether things were “different” for female candidates — looking back at the Clinton-Obama primary contest and Governor Palin’s experience as VP nominee, and looking forward to what Mona Sahlin, head of Sweden’s Social Democrats, may face on the trail.

One question that came up was whether or a not a woman should run as a female candidate, or whether women are better advised to leave the gender card aside.  We also talked about the positives and negatives of using personal stories on the trail — in particular, stories about motherhood — and whether voters would reconcile their desire for strong leaders with women candidates who let their “feminine side” take center stage.

Read More »

Are WaPo Photo Editors Making a Point?

I don’t know much about the Charles Freeman saga that recently ended with Freeman’s withdrawing his name from consideration to be chairman of the National Intelligence Council. I never heard of the man before last week and I only read brief highlights of the arguments at The Atlantic and The Weekly Standard.

David Broder published a defense of Freeman in today’s Washington Post. But what catches my eye is the bizarre picture of Freeman that accompanies the online version (don’t know if it’s in print). Take a look and tell me if Freeman looks more like a demented Muppet or someone about to be attacked by an angry mob.

Broder’s piece is titled “The Country’s Loss,” but given that picture, I’m not so sure.

Michael Steele, from Cradle to Career

Michael Steele’s interview with GQ, posted online today, has generated buzz because of Steele’s remarks on abortion. He uses the word “choice,” which triggered alarms across the right-wing and mainstream media.

In context, Steele’s remarks on abortion may be a little looser than one expects from a Republican Party chairman, but they are in line with pro-life sentiment as viewed through the prism of legal fact (it is a fact that women have a right to choose to have an abortion or not) and his own birth mother’s choice to put him up for adoption.

Steele has sought to clarify the remarks and tamp down any controversy.

The whole interview is actually worth a read because it’s illuminating and entertaining. Not one to mince words, Steele discusses his personal life, including his first moments with his adopted mother, his decision to enter – and then leave – seminary, and his taste in music and fashion.

He also raps political – talking about the fantasyland of bipartisanship, hot-button issues like (as noted) abortion and gay marriage, and Republican failure to comfortably incorporate outreach to African Americans in their broader message.

What surprised me more than his comments on abortion Read More »

Women of Courage

Yesterday was a big day for women’s issues in Washington.  President Obama announced the formation of an interagency advisory council on women and girls, headed up by Valerie Jarrett to help coordinate policy across government; the official release states that “The mission of the Council will be to provide a coordinated federal response to the challenges confronted by women and girls and to ensure that all Cabinet and Cabinet-level agencies consider how their policies and programs impact women and families.”

The president spoke in personal terms about his motivation for the council’s creation:

“I sign this order not just as a President, but as a son, a grandson, a husband, and a father, because growing up, I saw my mother put herself through school and follow her passion for helping others.  But I also saw how she struggled to raise me and my sister on her own, worrying about how she’d pay the bills and educate herself and provide for us.

I saw my grandmother work her way up to become one of the first women bank vice presidents in the state of Hawaii, but I also saw how she hit a glass ceiling — how men no more qualified than she was kept moving up the corporate ladder ahead of her.

I’ve seen Michelle, the rock of the Obama family, – juggling work and parenting with more skill and grace than anybody that I know.  But I also saw how it tore at her at times, how sometimes when she was with the girls she was worrying about work, and when she was at work she was worrying about the girls.  It’s a feeling that I share every day.

In so many ways, the stories of the women in my life reflect the broader story of women in this country — a story of both unyielding progress and also untapped potential.”

Meanwhile at State, First Lady Michelle Obama joined Secretary Clinton at the 3rd annual International Women of Courage awards, honoring women from around the world who are working — often against tough odds — to advance women’s rights in their home countries.

In the words of one of the honorees, Ambiga Sreenevasan of the Malaysian Bar,

This award has given us the opportunity which we would not otherwise have had, to share our stories, our successes, our failures, to reach out across our borders and to establish a base upon which we can build a meaningful network of support. These stories must be told in all our countries. By this experience, we are both enriched and enraged; enriched by what we have shared, and enraged that so many of our sisters endure intimidation and suffering in their countries. Nevertheless, ours is a message of hope that something has been achieved, despite the odds.

And over the weekend, the president also announced the appointment of Melanne Verveer to head up the State Department’s first-ever ambassador-at-large for Global Women’s Issues.   Melanne is well equipped for the job, having spent the past decade heading up the Vital Voices Global Partnership, which supports emerging women leaders in countries around the world.

Democratic Hangover

Congressmen Taped CallWith the thrill of passing a trillion dollar porkapalooza bill past them, it seems many Democrats are getting that queasy, hangover feeling as they wake up to the realization that they’re going to have to take responsibility for the consequences of their actions.

Newsweek’s Howard Fineman reports today that the “establishment” is already in major CYA mode, mumbling to him that Obama “may not have what it takes” and clearly trying to put distance between itself and the administration’s policies. It took Jimmy Carter years to reach this point. Unless windmills, solar cells and studies of pig flatulence can turn this economy around, there’s going to be a lot more “mumbling” coming from “the establishment.”

Even Democratic economists are raising doubts. As John Boehner’s excellent blog highlights today, they’re now saying that the stimulus won’t work as advertised.

“[A] leading Democratic economist, Mark Zandi, said that the Administration’s stimulus package would create 1 million fewer jobs than the White House has predicted.” And according to the Associated Press, “Allen Sinai, chief global economist at Decision Economics Inc., said Obama is too optimistic when he predicts that the recently enacted $787 billion stimulus bill will save or create at least 3.5 million jobs over two years.”

Of course, their solution is to spend even more. Soon they’ll be saying that Obama didn’t do it right and didn’t listen to their advice. If I were the administration, I’d be feeling pretty queasy now too.

McConnell: Dems (Spend, Tax, Borrow) Too Much

Financial MeltdownApparently Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell has been listening to some Dave Matthews.

Today, McConnell delivered strong remarks from his grandfather’s porch on the Senate floor opposing the president’s budget. Two things jumped out at me.

First, a pretty startling statistic that is sure to get a lot of play on the right. According to McConnell, “In just 50 days, Congress has voted to spend about $1.2 trillion between the stimulus and the omnibus. To put that in perspective, that’s about $24 billion a day, or about $1 billion an hour – most of it borrowed.”

How much is Democratic leadership costing America? About a billion dollars an hour.

Second, what will become a Republican litany: “Over the next few weeks, the Senate will debate the details of this budget. But one thing is already certain: it spends too much, it taxes too much, and it borrows too much.”

And in case you missed it: “A $3.6 trillion budget that spends too much, taxes too much, and borrows too much in a time of economic hardship may be bold. The question is, is it wise?” Read More »

Obama’s Unspoken Praise for NCLB

President Obama delivered a solid speech on education yesterday, trying to create a bit of space between him and the teachers’ unions, challenging students not to be slackers and drop-outs, and talking up parental responsibility.

He introduced a new phrase to the Obama lexicon: “cradle to career,” to describe his vision of pre-school through post-secondary education. (The name appears to come from a 2007 Pew/Education Week report.)

And he asserted that, when it comes to figuring out why many schools are terrible, the “time for finger-pointing is over.” (Though presumably not in first grade, where finger-pointing remains a time-honored tradition.)

What’s most interesting is how much the spirit of No Child Left Behind imbues the president’s education agenda. Read More »

Saletan, Levin on Stem Cells

The web has been filled with contentiousness and hot air over yesterday’s presidential stem cell directive (including here), but these two pieces present an analysis a cut above the rest:

Slate‘s William Saletan offers a fresh perspective on the issue and how it relates to another moral policy dilemma currently confronting the country.

In today’s Washington Post, Yuval Levin, who for my money is the smartest young conservative thinker in Washington, discusses why we should be careful about falling into the technocracy trap.

FTC Tries, and Fails, to Infiltrate My Head

For the past few months, during many of my waking hours, I’ve had two commercial jingles running through my head: Five Dollar Footlong and freecreditreport.com.

Both songs exemplify the “utterly obvious” style of raising brand awareness. The first is about a sandwich, roughly twelve inches in length, that is sold for five dollars. The second touts a web site that you can find by typing “freecreditreport.com” into your web browser.

Both products have grown more appealing during the recession: Five Dollar Footlongs as an economical way to avoid starvation (and put America back to work); freecreditreport.com as a way for credit-dependent consumers (and who isn’t?) to make sure they’re fully briefed on what’s in their permanent record.

Except that, despite its name, freecreditreport.com isn’t really free. The free credit report is a lure to get consumers to sign up for other services, with varying degrees of aforethought.

The only truly free credit reporting service authorized by the Federal Trade Commission is annualcreditreport.com. While the three credit bureaus may offer you additional services, the pitch is clear and the opt-out is easy.

Now the FTC is launching its own jingles to compete with freecreditreport.com. Read More »

A Missed Opportunity on Stem Cells

President Obama’s remarks on stem cell policy today were disappointing. Not because of the policy change – that was expected – but because the president missed an opportunity to have a serious discussion about the issue, instead opting for tired, dogmatic attacks.

Serious people understand that many Americans appreciate the enormous healing potential of stem cell therapies, but also have concerns about the manner in which those therapies are developed.

President Obama claimed to understand this dilemma, too. He referred to a “difficult and delicate balance” in pursuing research responsibly. He also said, “We must respect [the] point of view” of people who oppose embryonic stem cell research on ethical grounds.

And yet, just moments before, the president dismissed the notion of any real dilemma, claiming that the previous Administration “forced … a false choice between sound science and moral values.” How can he expect people to respect a false choice? Read More »

Prompted by Robert Schlesinger

As Vinca mentioned below, Robert Schlesinger offered his opinion about President Obama’s use of the teleprompter – and given Schlesinger’s thorough knowledge of White House speech history, his opinion should be given weight. But I don’t think he’s entirely right.

The crux of Schlesinger’s argument is that there’s no difference between delivering a speech using prepared remarks on paper and delivering a speech using prepared remarks on a teleprompter. As far as the text is concerned, that’s true.

But there are two key differences between paper and prompter: Read More »

Lesson of financial crisis: communications is policy

In line with what Ed says below about the tone of POTUS’ comments to the New York Times, a very excellent and very short book has just come out from the Hoover Institution Press.  Getting off Track by Hoover scholar John Taylor traces the origins of the current global crisis and concludes that ill-considered government actions caused the financial upheaval, worsened it and are now prolonging it.

What were those actions?  A number of usual suspects — especially Federal Reserve Board policy — and some entirely unusual ones.  Taylor presents amazingly comprehensible charts and simple explanations of normally opaque global interest rate data to draw the curtain back on the mysteries of the financial markets.  There, in addition to Fed misaction, he finds fear — mind seizing, knee knocking fear brought on by… government communications, in particular overwrought rhetoric in both the last and the current administrations.  The  global financial markets have sunk into the fetal position, rocking back and forth and whimpering about disasters coming, because leaders of the US government in particular have been screaming about coming disasters.  Taylor makes brilliant use of interest rate differentials to strip out varying sources of risk.  He tightly links movements in rates to officials’ statements before Congress.   Many are wondering why Citibank is trading so low these days.  Perhaps Administration communications about nationalization of banks has something to do with it.  As Taylor demonstrates, communications strongly influences perceptions of risk, and perceptions of risk are at the heart of our current crisis.

Chicago Tribune on Favreau

The Chicago Tribune offers some insight into the Obama-Favreau speechwriting team, which emphasizes crafting speeches as stories.

“You and I always tell a story pretty well,” the president reportedly told Favreau, and I think that’s a nice way to look at the process.

Also, I nominate David Axelrod for head of the speechwriters’ union:

“I’ve never worked for a politician who values words as much as the president does,” Obama senior adviser David Axelrod said. “The speechwriter is an unusually important person in the operation.”

POTUS Speaks to the NY Times

President Obama’s interview with the New York Times the other day covered a lot of ground, including four things that struck me:

1) The president offered some reassuring words on the economy, which needed to be said:

What I don’t think people should do is suddenly stuff money in their mattresses and pull back completely from spending. I don’t think that people should be fearful about our future. I don’t think that people should suddenly mistrust all of our financial institutions because the overwhelming majority of them actually have managed things reasonably well.

2) The president used the phrase “success in Iraq”: Read More »